In any of development program or in institution
building process, the role of leadership plays vital role in shaping the
process and intended outcome. Under the adaptive and creative leadership of Geoffrey
Canada, the Harlem Children’s Zone has been evolved as an innovative social
model, in which a creative and productive space for children in their
neighborhood to be developed and space to be facilitated under the guidance of
critical mass of caring adult. This innovative model imbibes the core value of
sustainability of development approach in itself, where involvement of external
agents and actors help in designing the implementation process of the program
by coordinating with the contextual reality. Geoffrey Canada believes that a
comprehensive approach of development, in which he identifies ‘sound health
care, intellectual and social stimulation and consistence guidance’, brings
positive change in the life of children, who born and brought up in vulnerable
neighborhood like Harlem.
Apart from integrated program model, Geoffrey
Canada also recognizes the role of staff members and their contribution to make
the model to be effectively implemented and administrative aspects of the
organization to be efficiently evolved. This seems a challenging task for the
leader to involve everyone in the same pace and process in designing the
implementation strategy. However, involvement and regular visit of Geoffrey
Canada with the staff members and centers very useful in capacity building of staff
members to recognize the significance of doing and why they have been doing
this project?
In fact, this kind of involvement stimulates the
process and enables the staffs to understand the core value of implementing the
project in broader perspective. This process of sharing and learning from each
other was a useful exercise within the organization to evaluate the ongoing
process and also to build capacity of the staff members, which would make
effective and efficient. The organizational structure and its management of HCZ
provides evidences to understand the delegation of responsibility,
decentralized decision making structure and direct involvement of Senior level
staffs in providing guidance and building confidence seems a core organization
philosophy to evaluate output and impact of ongoing program in the working
areas of organization.
Geoffrey Canada was firm believer of deepening
the organization’s efforts rather than broadening the scope of implementation
on the basis of ‘externally perceived needs’ and assessment. In many instances,
this has been acknowledged that there is missing link of collaboration between
deliverable outputs and coordination within the delegation of responsibility. However,
the Harlem Children’s Zone’s mission to bring structural changes in life of
children and youth by building safe and enabling environment in and around
neighborhood. But, the situation could be better if the organization evolve
strategic clarity about its priorities on the basis of available resources
(both financial and human) and its performance measurement indicators at
initial stage of program implementation. This seems challenging in the context
of nonprofit organization like HCZ, because its serve to generate public value,
which benefits the community at large. Both internal and external evaluation of
HCZ’s programs appreciates these efforts and outcomes.
In many studies including Dobbie and Fryer
Study, there are many key findings such as,
·
HCZ
should introduce lottery system in its charter schools
·
High
quality of schooling impact positively rather than community services
·
HCZ’s
educational initiative enhance achievement level in elementary school and math
in middle school
·
High
per capital cost of investment is major concern
These studies have critically evaluated the
organization as well as other external agents, but findings suggest HCZ for
introspection and to build its data systematically. During this study, both
researchers and staffs members had tough time in collecting and selecting data
from the field. In fact, this is also true that working in a vulnerable
situation and context, an integrative and comprehensive approach of development
is required for.
The HCZ highlights multi layers of community
services, which ensure involvement of parents and children since birth to
college education. In fact, this is one of the important push factor for upward
social mobility of those children, who born and brought up in a kind of
context, where consistent supportive system is required for their cognitive and
physical development. This is a fact that education is single most effective
approach to end the cycle of intergeneration poverty, but this does not mean
that other non-educational initiatives go in vain in long term. Both
educational and non-educational initiatives need to be coordinated effectively
and enabling environment assists individual to attain healthy adulthood,
independent and responsible personality.
During the Presidential Campaign in 2007, Mr Obama
presented an outlined of an initiative that was primarily evolved to help those
families, who are in high poverty zones and to build healthy urban
neighborhood. The foundation of his design of intervention was based on the
core philosophy of HCZ. In 2008, $10
million fund was developed to build The Promise Neighborhood in 20 cities in
the United States and the allocation of fund was the responsibility of
Department of Education. After legislative measure, the Promise Neighborhood is
now a reality and the HCZ’s learning and struggle is being incorporated for
enabling the community to look after and implement Promise Neighborhood
Initiative in their respective community.
I agree that the HCZ’s is still in the process
of shaping up its program and also in struggle to address the core issue of
development at organization and field level. But, this should also recognize
that the programmatic interventions and integrative approach of HCZ has
positively affected the community at large. Why poor children are not able to
successful in their life? Not simply because of their origin, but they don’t
find any supportive mechanism in and around their surroundings to make their destination
better. I completely agree that the Promise Neighborhood Initiative would create
an ecosystem at community level, where a group of people able to identify the
process to implement some program, which already being implemented in HCZ’s
working areas.
The success of HCZ is based on time and proper
coordination of leadership.
No comments:
Post a Comment