Participation in the workforce can be empowering for women in a number
of ways, providing them independent earning, new skills and exposure to the
outside world and also structure of the authority. However, men reports higher
work participation than women in India.
According to Indian National Sample Survey, man labor force
participation stood at 85 percent while female’s at 35 percent in India. This
is also true that in most part of the world, the women have secondary position
and the responsibility of bread earning is on the man. However, the most of the
Indian women are working belong to lower strata of the society.
The male labor force in agriculture has declined; this has increased the
house hold as well as agriculture burden on the rural Indian women. A large
number of women are occupied as in the domestic help and household production,
but to calculate their contribution as in the tangible income source is a
complex issue. According the Human Development Report, 1995, there is hardly any difference between the women in developing countries and developed
countries in term of number of hour and total number of work. In developing
countries, this share is 53% and in developed or industrialized countries their
share is 51%. Although, this comparison is just to show the situation of women
at global stage.
Currently, the women have a large participation in sectors of the
economy not officially labeled as ‘work’ such as participation in the non
monetized sector and assisting with family based or house hold based economic
activity; this nature of work is not reflected in the national accounting
scheme.
Furthermore, a number of factors impede women’s entry into the
workforce, such as social security for women workers, including maternity
benefits, Medicare, accident compensation and occupational safety measures are
virtually nonexistent. The most of the employment related benefits go to
workers in the organized sectors, generally, educated urban male and female get
these benefit. The job opportunity in the organized sector limits the
involvement of even the functional literate women in the workforce.
The National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGS), a innovative
employment scheme in the rural India, which strengthen the equity and
inclusiveness in workforce in India. In recently held international conference
on NREGS, a paper presented by Jayati Ghosh shows that the women’s share in
total rural workforce in India is 36.2 percent, while in women’s share in total
workforce under NREGS is 48.9 percent.
The NREGS has been critically evaluated on the basis of productive
utility and creative utilization of program. The implementation of this program
is quite challenging, this is not because of the faulty nature but the lack of
institutional effectiveness and also of the effective mechanism. The nature of
the program is going to make its base in addressing many social economic issues
in the rural areas.
The productive utility is creating at least the 100 days exposure to the
rural women and they are able to meet the other women of the same villages. In
the normal day to day life, this kind of exposure possibility is highly rare.
While working in this program would enable them to interact with many policy
issues and also with their political representative. Although, this is little
ambitious to discuss this possibility but the NREGS creates opportunity of this
nature for the rural women. As far as creative utilization of the resource is
amazing suggestion, but the creativity and innovation comes quite lately or
never comes in the life of rural women. The sole objective of the rural women
with this program to get some cash and kind benefit, while working within their
own village.
The 73rd and 74th Constitutional
Amendments, passed in 1993, decentralized state government and allotted power
to local Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs). The same amendment reserved one
third of seats for women in local government bodies, as well as made additional
reservation for other marginalized groups. There remain a number of challenges
in ensuring that women in PRIs have equal voices and representation in
political institutions. Elected bodies continue to be largely male-dominated
structures, with male members taking leadership roles and controlling decision
making. In many instances, this has been seen that men have tried to take
advantage of their wife’s elected role or infringe on her position of
influence. Additionally, reservations in municipals bodies and PRIs have not
been accompanied by reservations in the Parliament or State Assemblies.